How to Choose PU Foam Catalyst?

23 Dec.,2024

 

Catalysts for PU Flexible Foam

Umicore uses certain monitoring and tracking technologies such as cookies. These technologies are used in order to maintain, provide and improve our services on an ongoing basis, and in order to provide our web visitors with a better experience.

Check now

By clicking on the "Accept all" button you agree to the use of these cookies while using the website. For further information regarding how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please see section 11 of our website privacy notice. 

Polyurethane catalyst compositions for improving foam ...

  • the present invention

    relates to tertiary amine catalysts for producing polyurethane foam.

  • Polyurethane foams

    are widely known and used in automotive, housing and other industries. Such foams are produced by reaction of a polyisocyanate with a polyol in the presence of various additives.

  • One such additive

    is a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) blowing agent which vaporizes as a result of the reaction exotherm, causing the polymerizing mass to form a foam.

  • CFC

    chlorofluorocarbon

  • the discovery that CFCs deplete ozone in the stratosphere

    has resulted in mandates diminishing CFC use.

  • Production of water-blown foams, in which blowing is performed with CO2 generated by the reaction of water with the polyisocyanate

    has therefore become increasingly important.

  • Tertiary amine catalysts

    are typically used to accelerate blowing (reaction of water with isocyanate to generate CO2) and gelling (reaction of polyol with isocyanate).

  • the ability of the tertiary amine catalyst to selectively promote either blowing or gelling

    is an important consideration in selecting a catalyst for the production of a particular polyurethane foam. If a catalyst promotes the blowing reaction to a too high degree, much of the CO2 will be evolved before sufficient reaction of isocyanate with polyol has occurred, and the CO2 will bubble cut of the formulation, resulting in collapse of the foam. A foam of poor quality will be produced. In contrast, if a catalyst too strongly promotes the gelling reaction, a substantial portion of the CO2 will be evolved after a significant degree of polymerization has occurred. Again, a poor quality foam, this time characterized by high density, broken or poorly defined cells, or other undesirable features, will be produced.

  • Tertiary amine catalysts

    generally are malodorous and offensive and many have high volatility due to their low molecular weight. Release of tertiary amines during foam processing may present significant safety and toxicity problems, and release of residual amines from consumer products is generally undesirable.

  • Amine catalysts which contain urea functionality

    have an increase in molecular weight and hydrogen bonding and reduced volatility and odor when compared to related structures which lack this functionality. Furthermore, catalysts which contain urea functionality chemically bond into the urethane during the reaction and are not released from the finished product. Catalyst structures which embody this concept are typically of low to moderate activity and promote both the blowing (water-isocyanate) and the gelling (polyol-isocyanate) reactions to varying extents.

  • U.S. 4,644,017

    discloses the use of certain diffusion stable amino alkyl ureas having tertiary amino groups in the production of a polyisocyanate addition product which do not discolor or change the constitution of surrounding materials. Specifically taught are Catalyst A and Catalyst D which are reaction products of dimethylaminopropylamine and urea.

  • U.S. 4,007,140

    discloses the use of N,N-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl)urea as a low odor catalyst for the manufacture of polyurethanes.

  • U.S. 4,194,069

    discloses the use of N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-(3-morpholinopropyl)urea, N,N'-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl)urea and N,N'-bis(3-morpholinopropyl)urea as catalysts for producing polyurethane foams.

  • U.S. 4,094,827

    discloses the use of certain alkyl substituted ureas including N,N-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl)urea which provide lower odor and a delay in the foaming reaction that aids in the production of polyurethane foam.

  • U.S. 4,330,656

    discloses the use of N-alkyl ureas as catalysts for the reaction of 1,5-napthylene diisocyanate with polyols or for the chain extension of prepolymers based upon 1,5-napthylene diisocyanate without accelerating atmospheric oxidation.

  • DE 30 27 796 A1

    discloses the use of higher molecular weight dialkyl aminoalkyl ureas as reduced odor catalysts for the production of polyurethane foam.

  • the present invention

    provides a catalyst composition for making flexible polyurethane foam.

  • the catalyst composition

    comprises 3-dimethylaminopropyl urea and N,N'-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl) urea, i.e., the mono- and bis-ureas of 3-dimethylaminopropylamine, respectively.

  • These catalyst compositions

    which comprise a mixture of the mono and bis alkyl substituted ureas in amounts from >0 to &#; 100 mole% mono-urea and >0 to &#; 100 mole% bis-urea improves the physical properties of the polyurethane foam.

  • the ratio of the two urea compounds

    can be varied to systematically control flowability, airflow, and force-to-crush physical properties for flexible foams to enhance processibility.

  • Increasing the N, N'-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl) urea to 3-dimethylaminopropyl urea ratio

    increases the airflow and decreases the force-to-crush values of the foam while decreasing the N,N-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl) urea to 3-dimethylaminopropyl urea ratio improves the flowability of the foaming composition.

  • An additional advantage of these catalysts

    is that they contain a ureido group which will react with isocyanate and chemically bond into the urethane during the reaction; therefore, the catalyst is not released from the finished foam product.

  • the catalyst compositions according to the invention

    catalyze the reaction between an isocyanate functionality and an active hydrogen-containing compound, i.e. an alcohol, a polyol, an amine or water, especially the urethane (gelling) reaction of polyol hydroxyls with isocyanate to make polyurethanes and the blowing reaction of water with isocyanate to release carbon dioxide for making foamed polyurethanes.

  • an active hydrogen-containing compound

    i.e. an alcohol, a polyol, an amine or water

  • the flexible polyurethane foam products, slab and molded,

    are prepared using any suitable organic polyisocyanates well known in the art including, for example, hexamethylene diisocyanate, phenylene diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate (&#;TDI&#;) and 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (&#;MDI&#;).

  • TDI

    hexamethylene diisocyanate

  • MDI

    4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate

  • 2,4- and 2,6-TDI's

    individually or together as their commercially available mixtures.

  • Other suitable isocyanates

    are mixtures of diisocyanates known commercially as "crude MDI", marketed as PAPI by Dow Chemical, which contain about 60% of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate along with other isomeric and analogous higher polyisocyanates.

  • prepolymers

    of these polyisocyanates comprising a partially prereacted mixture of a polyisocyanate

  • polyalkylene ether and polyester polyols

    Illustrative of suitable polyols as a component of the polyurethane composition are the polyalkylene ether and polyester polyols.

  • the polyalkylene ether polyols

    include the poly(alkylene oxide) polymers such as poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide) polymers and copolymers with terminal hydroxyl groups derived from polyhydric compounds, including diols and triols, for example, among others, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, 1,3-butane diol, 1,4-butane diol, 1,6-hexane diol, neopentyl glycol, diethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, pentaerythritol, glycerol, diglycerol, trimethylol propane and like low molecular weight polyols.

  • a single high molecular weight polyether polyol

    may be used.

  • mixtures of high molecular weight polyether polyols

    such as mixtures of di- and trifunctional materials and/or different molecular weight or different chemical composition materials may be used.

  • Useful polyester polyols

    include those produced by reacting a dicarboxylic acid with an excess of a diol, for example, adipic acid with ethylene glycol or butanediol, or reacting a lactone with an excess of a diol such as caprolactone with propylene glycol.

  • the masterbatches, or premix compositions

    frequently contain a polymer polyol.

  • Polymer polyols

    are used in polyurethane foam to increase the foam's resistance to deformation, i.e. to increase the load-bearing properties of the foam.

  • the first type

    described as a graft polyol, consists of a triol in which vinyl monomers are graft copolymerized. Styrene and acrylonitrile are the usual monomers of choice.

  • the second type

    is a polyol containing a polyurea dispersion formed by the reaction of a diamine and TDI. Since TDI is used in excess, some of the TDI may react with both the polyol and polyurea.

  • This second type of polymer polyol

    has a variant called PIPA polyol which is formed by the in-situ polymerization of TDI and alkanolamine in the polyol.

  • polymer polyols

    may comprise 20-80% of the polyol portion of the masterbatch.

  • chain extenders

    such as ethylene glycol and butanediol

  • crosslinkers

    such as diethanolamine, diisopropanolamine, triethanolamine and tripropanolamine

  • blowing agents

    such as water, CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs, pentane

  • cell stabilizers

    such as silicones.

  • a general polyurethane flexible foam formulation having a 1-3 lb/ft 3 (16-48 kg/m 3 ) density (e.g., automotive seating) containing a catalyst such as the catalyst composition according to the invention

    would comprise the following components in parts by weight (pbw): Flexible Foam Formulation pbw Polyol 20-100 Polymer Polyol 80-0 Silicone Surfactant 1-2.5 Blowing Agent 2-4.5 Crosslinker 0.5-2 Catalyst 0.5-2 Isocyanate Index 70-115

  • the reactive catalyst compositions

    You will get efficient and thoughtful service from Yourun Synthetic Material.

    comprise the compounds represented by the following formulas I and II in any mole% ratio, preferably 50 to 95 mole% mono-urea (I), for controlling process latitude in a cost effective manner.

  • the mole%

    is based on moles of mono-urea (I) and bis-urea (II).

  • the catalyst composition

    should contain 80 to 95 mole% mono-urea (I) and 5 to 20 mole% bis-urea (II).

  • the catalyst composition

    should be 5 to 20 mole% mono-urea (I) and 80 to 95 mole% bis-urea (II).

  • the catalyst composition

    may contain up to 20 wt% unreacted urea (III), based on the weight of compounds (I) and (II).

  • Compounds I and II

    are prepared by reacting urea and N,N-dimethylaminopropylamine in the appropriate molar ratios under an inert atmosphere at elevated temperatures. Compounds I and II can be isolated individually by chromatographic techniques known in the synthesis art.

  • a catalytically effective amount of the catalyst composition

    is used in the polyurethane formulation. More specifically, suitable amounts of the catalyst composition may range from about 0.01 to 10 parts by wt per 100 parts polyol (pphp) in the polyurethane formulation, preferably 0.05 to 1 pphp.

  • the catalyst composition

    may be used in combination with, or also comprise, other tertiary amine, organotin or carboxylate urethane catalysts well known in the urethane art.

  • a 94:6 mole ratio blend of 3-dimethylaminopropyl urea (I) and N, N'-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl) urea (II) catalyst mixture

    was prepared using a one liter 3 neck round bottom flask fitted with the following: mechanical stirrer, reflux condenser, nitrogen bubbler, and a temperature controlled heating mantle. The flask was charged with 176.3 g of urea [CH 4 N 2 O] and 300.0 g of N,N-dimethylaminopropylamine [(CH 3 ) 2 NCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 NH 2 ]. The mixture was stirred at a constant rate while being slowly heated to 120°C.

  • the reaction

    was controlled at 120°C until all signs of NH 3 evolution had ceased (as evidenced by bubbling in the N 2 pressure relief device).

  • the pale yellow liquid

    was cooled to 80°C and the flask containing the liquid was evacuated via vacuum pump and refilled with N 2 three times to remove any volatiles still present.

  • Quantitative 13 C NMR

    showed the final product to be 86 mole% 3-dimethylaminopropyl urea (I), 5 mole% N, N-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl) urea (II), and 9 mole% unreacted urea.

  • the mono to bis mole ratio

    is 17.2 to 1, or 94:6 ratio of mono urea to bis urea.

  • a one liter 3 neck round bottom flask

    was fitted with the following: mechanical stirrer, reflux condenser, nitrogen bubbler, and a temperature controlled heating mantle.

  • the flask

    was charged with 83.96 g of urea [CH 4 N 2 O] and 300 g of N, N-dimethylaminopropylamine [(CH 3 ) 2 NCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 NH 2 ].

  • the mixture

    was stirred at a constant rate while being slowly heated to 120°C.

  • the reaction

    was controlled at 120°C for 1.5 hours and then the reaction temperature was increased to 140°C, 160°C and finally 180°C.

  • the temperature

    was increased each time after ammonia evolution stopped.

  • Excess N, N-dimethylaminopropylamine

    was removed via distillation.

  • Quantitative 13 C NMR

    showed the product to be 98 mole % N,N-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl) urea (II) and 2 mole % 3-dimethylaminopropyl urea (I).

  • Example 1 catalyst

    A blend of 21.6 g of Example 1 catalyst and 15.9 g of Example 2 catalyst produced a mixture which contained 51 mole% I and 44 mole% II and 5 mole% unreacted urea.

  • a polyurethane flexible foam

    was prepared in a conventional manner in a 12"x12"x3" (30.5x30.5x7.6 cm) heated test block mold at 160°F (71°C).

  • the polyurethane formulation in parts by weight

    was: COMPONENT pbw E-648 60 E-519 40 DC- 0.6 DC- 0.2 Diethanolamine 1.49 Water 3.5

  • E-519

    a styrene-acrylonitrile copolymer filled polyether polyol from Arco Chemical Co.

  • Table I

    lists the physical properties obtained using the catalysts from Examples 1-3.

  • the foam tested

    met standard specifications listed in ASTM D -91 and the tests were performed using ASTM designation D -95.

  • the force-to-crush results

    were obtained using a mechanical device equipped with a pound (454 kg) capacity pressure transducer mounted between the 50 square inch (323 cm 2 ) circular plate and the drive shaft.

  • the Dayton motor specifications, model 4Z528,

    include 1/6 horsepower (124 J/S) with F/L rpm of and F/L torque of 5.63 in-lb (6.36x10 4 Nm).

  • the actual pressure

    is shown on a digital display. The pad is compressed to 50% of its original thickness and the force necessary to achieve the compression is recorded.

  • a cycle

    takes 24 seconds to complete and the actual crushing of the foam occurs within 7-8 seconds.

  • This device

    mimics the ASTM D-, Indentation Force Deflection Test, and provides a numerical value for 1 minute post demolded foam initial hardness or softness.

  • Example 1

    Catalyst

  • Example 2

    Catalyst

  • Example 3

    Catalyst Mono/Bis Ratio 94:6 0:100 53:47 pphp 1.17 1.17 1.17 Density (lb/ft 3 ; kg/m 3 ) 1.95; 31.2 1.91; 30.6 1.9; 30.4 Airflow (SCFM; L/min) 3.3; 93.4 3.71; 105.1 3.62; 102.5 Force-to-Crush(lbf; N) 108; 479 65; 289 97; 431 25% ILD (lbf; N) 23; 102 22; 98 23; 102 65% ILD (lbf; N) 61; 271 62; 275 62; 275 25%R ILD

  • Example 4

    demonstrates that increasing levels of N, N'-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl) urea (II) increased airflow and decreased force-to-crush physical properties of flexible foam. This improves processing latitude and decreases shrinkage of the foam.

  • II

    N, N'-bis(3-dimethylaminopropyl) urea

  • a polyurethane foam

    was prepared in a conventional manner using the same formulation as listed in Example 4.

  • the catalyst (Table II)

    was added to 202 g of the premix in a 32 oz (951 ml) paper cup and the formulation was mixed for 20 seconds at RPM using an overhead stirrer fitted with a 2 in (5.1 cm) diameter stirring paddle.

  • the 32 oz (951 ml) cup

    was dropped through a hole in the bottom of a 128 oz ( ml) paper cup placed on a stand.

  • the hole

    was sized to catch the lip of the 32 oz (951 ml) cup.

  • the total volume of the foam container

    was 160 oz ( ml). Foams approximated this volume at the end of the foam forming process.

  • the force-to-crush data in Table II

    were obtained using a heated test block mold at 160°F (71°C) and crushing the foam 1 minute post demold.

  • Top of Cup 1

    represents the time required for the foam formulation to fill a 32 oz (951 ml) cup and is an indication of reaction initiation.

  • Top of Cup 2

    represents the time required for the foam formulation to fill a 128 oz (3.8 L) bucket in addition to the 32 oz (951 ml) Cup mentioned above and is an indication of reaction progression.

  • String Gel and Full Rise

    are further measures of reaction progression and provide some indication of extent of cure.

  • catalyst use levels

    were chosen to match string gel times.

  • Example 1 catalyst (II)

    provided an initial delay in reaction initiation (longer TOC 1) while providing cure within the same time as Example 2 catalyst (II). This initial delay allows for greater flowability of the foam and improves processing latitude.

  • the invention

    provides catalyst compositions for making flexible polyurethane foam.

    Want more information on PU Foam Catalyst? Feel free to contact us.