The injection molding process is widely used in large volume production as it produces comparatively low scrap production and has high repeatability. The versatility of the injection molding process demands much broader design considerations. Most of the design considerations will be made on the mould after setting out the product requirements.
Please visit our website for more information on this topic.
Some of the factors that affect the injection molding design include: how the part will be used (singular product or for assembly), its dimensional and mechanical requirements, and its ability to withstand elements such as chemicals or pressure. Some vital tips to consider when designing for injection molding are explored below.
Different injection molding materials offer varying properties. For example, some injection molding materials provide more dimensional stability than others. Similarly, some bond better with adhesives than others. Material design considers the following: temperature, pressure, biological and chemical interactions.
Thermoplastic resins can be broadly classified into amorphous and semi-crystalline. While semi-crystalline thermoplastics offer better chemical and electrical resistance, their amorphous counterparts are much more dimensionally stable and more resistant to impact. Material selection can affect the required tolerance level or certain features, like wall thickness.
Semi-crystalline resins Amorphous resins Advantages Excellent for bearing, wear and structural applications
Tolerances are affected by the shrinkage that occurs during the cooling process. Amorphous materials like PLA generally have tighter tolerances than semi-crystaline materials like PEEK.
Tight tolerances make production more expensive, but they may be necessary for your part to fit or function properly, especially if it is used in an assembly.
We recommend contacting your supplier at the design stage to discuss the tolerance standards that they use.
For example, DIN contains a general tolerance table as a reference for different materials. If your supplier uses this standard and you need tighter tolerances or other standards, they will ask you to provide 2D drawings.
There are a few key points to consider to ensure you choose the right wall thickness for your injection molding design:
The following are the recommended wall thicknesses for different materials:
Material Recommended wall thickness ABS 1.143 mm 3.556 mm Acetal 0.762 mm 3.048 mm Acrylic (PMMA) 0.635 mm 12.7 mm Liquid Crystal Polymer 0.762 mm 3.048 mm Long-Fiber Reinforced Plastics 1.905 mm 27.94 mm Nylon 0.762 mm 2.921 mm PC (Polycarbonate) 1.016 mm 3.81 mm Polyester 0.635 mm 3.175 mm Polyethylene (PE) 0.762 mm 5.08 mm Polyphenylene Sulfide (PSU) 0.508 mm 4.572 mm Polypropylene (PP) 0.889 mm 3.81 mm Polystyrene (PS) 0.889 mm 3.81 mm Polyurethane 2.032 mm 19.05 mm
Many material removal processes such as CNC machining can produce vertical walls. However, creating a parts design for injection molding with vertical walls will cause the part to get stuck, particularly at the core, as the part contracts on cooling.
If too much force is applied to eject the part, the risk of damaging the ejector pins and even the mould becomes very high. Design the walls of parts with a slight slant to avoid this problem. This slanting is called a draft.
Due to the high complexity, it creates in designing, the draft is usually added at the final stages of the part design. Different surfaces require varying drafts. Textured surfaces require the most draft. Some common surfaces found in injection molding and their minimum draft angles are as follows.
Certain parts require ribs. Ribs and gussets give additional strength to parts and help to eliminate cosmetic defects like warping, sink and voids. These features are essential for structural components. Therefore, it is preferable to add them to parts rather than increase the thickness of parts to increase strength.
However, if not properly designed, this can lead to shrinkage. Shrinkage happens when the cooling rate of certain parts is much faster than others, resulting in the permanent bending of some sections. The warping can be effectively reduced by keeping the rib thickness between 50 60% of that of the wall it is attached to.
Applying radii to parts, when possible, eliminates sharp corners, which improves the flow of material and the parts structural integrity. Sharp corners cause weakness in the part as the molten material is made to flow through the corner or into the corner. The only places where sharp corners are unavoidable are the parting surfaces or shut-off surfaces.
Radii and fillets also aid in a part ejection as rounded corners are less likely to get stuck during ejection than sharp corners. Furthermore, sharp corners are also not structurally advisable as they lead to stress points that can fail. Radii help to smoothen out the stress on the corners.
Also, including sharp corners in your part will exponentially increase the cost of production as this would require the mould to feature sharp corners that can only be achieved using very expensive manufacturing techniques.
Add internal radii at least 0.5 times the thickness of the adjacent wall and external radii 1.5 times the size.
Snap fits are obtainable through undercuts. The straight-pull mould, which consists of two halves, and is the most straightforward design, is not suitable to manufacture parts with undercut features. This is due to the difficulty in machining such a mould with CNC and the tendency of the material to get stuck on ejection.
Undercuts are usually created using side cores. However, side cores significantly increase tooling costs. Luckily there are some design tips to achieve the function of an undercut without using side cores. One way of doing this is by introducing a slot instead.
Yihua Mould supply professional and honest service.
This is also referred to as a pass-through core. Another way is to adjust or move the parting line of the part. When doing this, also adjust the draft angle accordingly. Moving the parting lines is most suitable for undercuts that are on the outside of the part.
You can also use stripping undercuts, also referred to as bump offs. However, only use this feature when the part is flexible enough to deform and expand during ejection from the mould.
Also, give enough clearance: bump-offs must have a lead angle of 30° to 45° for effective ejection. All these alternatives to expensive side cores require significant redesigning of the part. When the redesign of a part is not possible due to the possibility that it may affect the functionality of the part, then you have to employ sliding side-actions and cores to deal with undercuts.
These features slide in as the mould closes and slide out as it opens. The side cores must move perpendicularly and have appropriate draft angles.
Bosses are cylindrical standoffs moulded into a plastic part to accept an insert, self-tapping screw, or pin for assembling or mounting parts.
The outer diameter (OD) of the boss should be 2.5 times the diameter of the screw diameter for self-tapping applications.
Bosses shouldnt be freestanding. Always attach bosses to a side wall or to the floor with ribs or gussets. Their thickness should not exceed 60% of the overall part thickness to minimize visible sink marks on the outside of the part.
For example, a part with an outer wall of 3 mm should have internal ribs that are no more than 1.7 mm thick.
In order to properly design and manufacture your part using injection molding, it is important for the manufacturer to understand from the outset what your requirements are in terms of its appearance.
One key point for the tool maker to consider is the gate location. Gates are entry sections through which the molten material enters the mould. The tool maker has to choose the type of the gates and position them strategically to minimize potential quality issues.
Gates also leave gate vestige or a visual indication that the part was gatedeven if it is subtle.
Thats why we recommend letting your supplier know about any aesthetic and functional requirements and defining where not to gate.
At Xometry Europe, we offer injection molding services with over 30 materials, such as plastics, synthetic and silicone rubber, and elastomers. Simply head over to our Quoting Engine to upload your model and select your part preferences to receive a 24h quote.
In cases that are not adaptable for side-actions, we can use manually removed inserts. These are mold components that are greater than a half-inch cube and are loaded by an operator into the press before it closes. After the part has been molded, the part is ejected along with the insert. The operator then takes the part and manually removes the insert and places it back into the mold for the next part.
Gating and ejector pins are a necessity for plastic resin to strategically enter the mold and plastic parts to effectively be ejected from the mold. We've learned from experience that there are several ways to gate or eject your part, and the locations should be considered before you are ready to proceed with tooling.
Tab gates are most commonly used as they offer a mold technician the optimal processing capabilities and have the ability to be increased in size if the process requires it. A tab gate is tapered down in size from the runner, so the smallest point is at the part's surface. This allows a freeze point between the part and runner removing the heat from the surface of the part. You want the heat removed from this surface to minimize any risk of sink in the part. After molding, the tab gate needs to be manually removed leaving a gate vestige within 0.005 in.
Sub gates are generally used by incorporating a tunnel gate into the side of the part or into an ejector pin (post gate). Both gate styles generally can decrease the size of the vestige left on the exterior of the part. Tunnel gates still enter the part externally, but are mid-way down a parts surface, so they typically leave less of a gate vestige. Post gates leave no visible vestige on the exterior of the part as the part fills through one of the ejector pins close to the perimeter of the part. The risk is the cosmetic shadow left on the opposite side of the part due to heat and part thickness. So, be cautious when using this for highly cosmetic parts that have texture or a high polish.
Hot tip gates work well as they have minimal part waste from sprue and runner systems. A hot tip is best for parts that require a balanced fill from the center to the outside edges. This minimizes any mold shift as tab gates can create an unbalanced pressure in a mold. Hot tip gates are often the most cosmetically appealing gate (about 0.050 in. diameter) and often times can be hidden in a dimple or around a logo or text.
Direct sprue gates are the least appealing and are used with specific materials that have a high glass content or where the middle of the part requires secondary machining. Direct sprue gates have a large diameter that is difficult to manually remove and often times require a fixture that is removed by milling.
With a solid grasp of the techniques to improve part moldability, it is much easier to move into low-volume, and eventually high-volume injection molding. The next step is to upload your 3D CAD model online where you'll receive an interactive quote with free DFM analysis within hours. As we said earlier, the DFM analysis will highlight any moldabilty issues and even suggest solutions. We recommend pairing that design feedback with a conversation with one of our experienced applications engineers who will help with any further guidance you might need before production begins. They can be reached at 877-479- or [ protected].
The company is the world’s best plastic injection mold design supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.